Nearly 25 years after the United Nation's first Earth Summit, we continue to find that private conservation is better for the environment than government control.
In light of the Malheur standoff, the New York Times asked six contributors "should the government still own so much land in the West, and should its control over that land be reduced?"
Multiple organizational forms shape range management today, and through a comparison of state, private, and federal lands in the US, this essay helps explain why trust land agencies are not more market-oriented stewards of the land and resources.
Federal control of grazing lands means that land-use debates are political. This essay explores ways to resolve competing demands through negotiation rather than conflict.
Two decades ago, Rick Stroup wrote about how the Endangered Species Act fueled animosity between endangered species and landowners. What has changed?
To protect lions and other endangered species, we must harness the tools of free market environmentalism to resolve human-wildlife conflict.
Every time hunting is banned, we end up with fewer animals. From lions and bison, to marine fisheries, John Stossel interviews Terry Anderson about property rights approaches to species conservation.
The new rule stands in the way of people who are trying to restore wetlands and protect wildlife.
Should trophy hunting be banned? Are California's water shortages manmade? PERC Senior Fellow Terry Anderson and PERC alum Zack Donohew weigh in on this week's Stossel.