top

perc

HOME

About PERC

Events

Fellowships

News

PERC Reports

Private Solutions

Publications

Research

Student Programs

Support PERC

Connect to PERC

Search

line

contact

Green Tea

 

PERC Reports: Volume 20,
No.1, Spring 2002 

Greener Pastures

Send to FriendE-mail   Printer Friendly Print

Bottled Icebergs

v[ Full text in PDF ]

More Greener Pastures
Life After Poaching
Full Steam Ahead
Australian Flower Power

On a hot summer's day, you can't beat a tall glass of ice water to cool things off. In the far northern regions of Canada, the people of Nunavut are hoping that a glass of iceberg water might be even better.

The plan is to harvest icebergs that have calved off nearby glaciers, melt them, bottle the water, and market it as clean drinking water to those who crave a taste of the Arctic. The project, which was put together by the Qikiqtaaluk Corp. and Pure Berg of Canada, would in part benefit the indigenous Inuit people who have inhabited the region for thousands of years.

Matthew Spence, the development manager, explains that iceberg water is free of any modern pollutants because it was frozen 10,000 years ago, at least in some cases. Although Spence himself does not care for the distinctive taste of the ancient water, he reports that he has had a positive response from several Asian nations, and particularly from the health food sector.

The corporation will pay $200 a ton for icebergs, which break off the glaciers by the thousands during the summer and float into Cumberland Sound and Davis Strait. The ice will be hauled onto ships, stored in waterproof containers, and transported to bottling plants.

If iceberg water catches on somewhere - anywhere - Spence predicts that a bottling plant could be built locally providing a year-round flow of iceberg water and needed jobs to local people.

Nunatsiaq News
PERC Reports Archives:

Spring 2002
Summary


2011
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2010
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2009
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2008
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2007
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2006
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2005
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2004
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2003
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2002
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2001
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2000
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4

[ search all ]

 

Recycling

What's wrong with our federal lands?

National TV Broadcasting and the rise of the regulatory state

Not a walk in the park