top

perc

HOME

About PERC

Events

Fellowships

News

Private Solutions

Publications

Research

Support PERC

Email Signup

RSS Feeds

Search

PERC Fellows

line

contact

 

PERC Reports: Volume 18,
No.3, Fall 2000 

Greener Pastures

Send to FriendE-mail   Printer Friendly Print

Farming Our Parks

v[ Full text in PDF ]

More Greener Pastures
Two For One
Monkey Business
Bye Bye Blacktop
Wanted: Goat Herders
Federal land management agencies are increasingly receptive to innovative partnerships that can help share the burden of managing millions of acres of public land. In the case of Ohio's Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area, farmers are being sought to run about 35 small family farms.

The legislation that created the 33,000-acre national park 25 years ago stipulated that the area would be preserved for its historic, scenic, natural and recreational values. Restoring the valley's agricultural landscape is one way to meet these goals.

Previous efforts failed because the National Park Service offered only one- to three-year-leases, and many of the tenants lacked farming experience. The new program benefits from the experiences of the past. New leases will run for 50 years, and applicants must submit their credentials along with a proposal for how they intend to use the land. In addition, park officials have formed the Cuyahoga Countryside Conservancy, which will provide technical assistance and recruit qualified farmers.

Certain restrictions go with the leases, including raising livestock and crops that are important to the traditions of the region. And because of the high visibility of the farms, the tenants must also be skilled at dealing with the public.

Ultimately, all parties should benefit. Eager farmers will have access to homesteads for long periods of time, the Park Service will collect rent, and visitors, most of whom come from nearby Cleveland and Akron, will have the pleasure of seeing a beautiful valley inhabited by working farms.

Cleveland Plain Dealer

search

PERC Reports:

Fall 2000
Summary


2010
  No.1  No.2
2009
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2008
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2007
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2006
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2005
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2004
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2003
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2002
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2001
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2000
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4

[ search all ]

 

Recycling

What's wrong with our federal lands?

National TV Broadcasting and the rise of the regulatory state