top

perc

HOME

About PERC

Events

Fellowships

News

PERC Reports

Private Solutions

Publications

Research

Student Programs

Support PERC

Connect to PERC

Search

line

contact

Green Tea

 

PERC Reports: Volume 18,
No.3, Fall 2000 

Greener Pastures

Send to FriendE-mail   Printer Friendly Print

Bye Bye Blacktop

v[ Full text in PDF ]

More Greener Pastures
Two For One
Monkey Business
Farming Our Parks
Wanted: Goat Herders
The demand for parking spaces could not keep pace with supply at fast-growing Dominican University in River Forest, Ill. School administrators were faced with paving over more lawns and in the process taking out 25 to 30 mature shade trees.

An alternative presented itself in the form of an earth-toned gravel parking lot called Gravelpave2, a system invented by Invisible Structures of Colorado. By ripping out the existing asphalt and applying the new surface material, the local contractor promised to expand parking by 20 percent without removing any trees.

The new parking lot was built in layers. First gravel was spread and covered with a water-permeable sheet that unrolls like carpet. The sheet is honeycombed with molded plastic rings that keep the gravel in place and prevent ruts from forming. A finer layer of gravel was then applied on top.

The gravel surface allows water to permeate the soil and prevents runoff, thus avoiding the cost of a drainage system and lightening the burden on local storm sewers. The permeable surface also allows rain to reach tree roots, preserving the campus trees.

The lot is low-maintenance and even damaged areas can be easily repaired without the unsightly patching that is common with asphalt. Despite the added initial cost of about 20 percent, Amy McCormack, who is in charge of the school's business affairs, definitely prefers the gravel. She has gone on record calling it more beautiful than any parking surface she has ever seen.

Chicago Sun-Times
PERC Reports Archives:

Fall 2000
Summary


2011
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2010
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2009
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2008
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2007
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2006
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2005
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2004
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2003
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2002
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2001
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2000
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4

[ search all ]

 

Recycling

What's wrong with our federal lands?

National TV Broadcasting and the rise of the regulatory state

Not a walk in the park