top

perc

HOME

About PERC

Events

Fellowships

News

PERC Reports

Private Solutions

Publications

Research

Student Programs

Support PERC

Connect to PERC

Search

line

contact

Green Tea

 

PERC Reports: Volume 26,
No.4, Winter 2008 

Greener Pastures

Send to FriendE-mail   Printer Friendly Print

Sunny Californ-I-A

More Greener Pastures
Gauchos go in style
A tsunami lesson
Tree-free paper

By Linda Platts

California utility companies are investing heavily in solar power. The utilities, along with many industry experts, expect the tax breaks for solar producers will make the cost of solar energy competitive with power from coal and natural gas by 2016 when the credits expire.

Pacific Gas & Electric is investing $3 billion to build five solar power plants in the Mojave Desert. The company expects the plants to generate 900 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 540,000 California homes. The builder, BrightSource Energy, will use a technology that concentrates the sunlight from thousands of moveable mirrors in order to run a steam turbine that generates electricity. The electricity will be fed into a transmission system to serve California’s coastal cities. In some cases, costly new transmission systems may be necessary.

Southern California Edison has taken a different path to solar power. It plans to install two square miles of solar cells on warehouse roof space leased from building owners in Riverside and San Bernardino counties. The electricity from these solar cells will feed directly into neighborhood circuits without the need for a central power station. The utility intends to spend $875 million to generate 250 megawatts of electricity for 162,000 homes. According to the Environmental News Network, the solar cells will generate the same amount of electricity as a small coal-powered plant.

 

While the companies have chosen different paths, they all lead to a huge commitment to the future of solar energy.

 

Comments


Add new comment:
Name *
E-mail  
Subject *
Comment *
number
In order to prevent "spam entries", we require that you enter the numerical code in the grey box, as you submit your posting. Thank you for your cooperation.
You may edit it as long as you don't exit your browser. After moderator approval, it will be visible for public.
PERC Reports Archives:

Winter 2008
Summary


2011
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2010
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2009
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2008
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2007
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2006
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2005
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2004
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2003
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2002
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2001
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2000
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4

[ search all ]

 

Recycling

What's wrong with our federal lands?

National TV Broadcasting and the rise of the regulatory state

Not a walk in the park