top

perc

HOME

About PERC

Events

Fellowships

News

PERC Reports

Private Solutions

Publications

Research

Student Programs

Support PERC

Connect to PERC

Search

line

contact

Green Tea

 

PERC Reports: Volume 26,
No.4, Winter 2008 
Send to FriendE-mail   Printer Friendly Print

Perpetuating Small Farms

Enviroprenuer Snapshots

By  Jeff Masten

Promoting local agriculture
In North Carolina, productive land is being lost to development while  more people are seeking locally grown foods. Triangle Land Conservancy, a community land trust, is encouraging the use of its lands for food production by offering long-term leases to new farmers.

The current paradigm for agricultural production focuses on farms that produce food on a large national and international scale, not on small, local farms. Over the last few decades, in my home state of North Carolina, local farms have lost their competitive edge and due to declining profitability are being supplanted by development. Urban communities near Raleigh, for example, lose working lands to development at the rate of 40 acres per day.

At the same time, there are changes in urban, suburban, and rural communities that are leading to more demand for locally produced foods and creating an opportunity to take a new look at local agriculture. People are increasingly concerned with the quality of food and in knowing how the food is produced. Moreover, transportation costs to move agricultural products from production to market are rising, while farmers markets, community supported agricultural cooperatives, and local and organic foods being sold in traditional grocery stores are in demand.

As part of its working lands protection program, Triangle Land Conservancy (TLC) has embarked on a new agenda to promote local small farm agriculture. What makes TLC’s “Small Farms-Local Food” initiative distinct is that a nonperpet profit land trust seeks to play an active role in supporting local agriculture by encouraging the production of agricultural products on its land— influencing the use of local markets and creative leasing arrangements with emerging farmers.

TLC is a community land trust whose region, known as the “Triangle,” is home to the Research Triangle Park in and around Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Like nearly 2,000 other land trusts in the country, TLC works with local community members to conserve natural resources and working lands. What sets TLC apart is not what it has done in the last 25 years, but what it will undertake in the future with Small Farms- Local Food.

In the Triangle, with a growing population of 1.5 million, the conservancy has accumulated 250 acres of valuable conservation acreage. A portion of that acreage, which is currently fallow farmland, has inherent value if placed back in production. TLC proposes to utilize its land assets through longterm leasing arrangements (30–50 years) with local food producers. These lease arrangements will provide a marketable security to farmers, enabling them access to lending institutions to borrow for capital improvements. In return, TLC will get lease payments and the farmer will have complete and long-term control of the land, similar to ownership. The lease payments will offset the cost of running the program, and with enough volume would generate cash-flow for TLC to consider leveraging the purchase of additional farmlands.

The best way to keep agricultural land in production, TLC believes, is to keep small farms profitable. Putting fallow lands back into agricultural production contributes to local economic development and the productivity of small farm agriculture can provide community benefits such as higher farmer revenues and tax revenues, generated from the larger per-acre income yields.

This initiative is designed to fill voids that currently inhibit entry into the market by new farmers because of high land acquisition costs. Land leasing is common in the agricultural field, however, contemporary land leases generally have a short duration, which is not conducive for farmers and banks to invest in capital improvement.

At the end of the day, with the Small Farms- Local Foods initiative, TLC hopes to stimulate a series of small farms into production in the Triangle, prompting a new look at the character of local agriculture.

JEFF MASTEN is the Director of Conservation Strategies for Triangle Land Conservancy and a PERC enviropreneur fellow. He can be reached at jeff@tlc-nc.org.

Comments

Paul Schwennesen - 5 October 2009 11:21
Great Idea!
However I have a lingering doubt: being the jaded capitalist that I am, I'm concerned that a long-term lease doesn't truly tap the self-interest mechanism that leads to long-term stewardship. I'm not sure that I would put the same devotion toward rented land as I would my own.

Could TLC perhaps change the parameters to a lease-option? Even the POSSIBILTY of owning the land later may encourage the proper stewardship mentality...

Just a notion.
Anne Pelham - 8 February 2009 13:21
Promoting small farms
I am a 65 year old woman who lives and works full time in Raleigh the last 6 years coming originally from Vt where in my youth small farms were quite common and now are not. I am an accountant by day and have some extra time on my hands on weekends particulary and also evenings after work. I there was something I could perhapsdo to help your organization I would be interested. Perhaps there are office tasks that need doing ...I have no idea but I would like to help thie Small Farms-Local Foods initiative if I could.

Regards,
Anne

Add new comment:
Name *
E-mail  
Subject *
Comment *
number
In order to prevent "spam entries", we require that you enter the numerical code in the grey box, as you submit your posting. Thank you for your cooperation.
You may edit it as long as you don't exit your browser. After moderator approval, it will be visible for public.
PERC Reports Archives:

Winter 2008
Summary


2011
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2010
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2009
  No.1  No.2  No.3
2008
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2007
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2006
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2005
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2004
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2003
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2002
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2001
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4
2000
  No.1  No.2  No.3  No.4

[ search all ]